<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia Link Condoms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fireflyseo.com/wikipedia-link-condoms/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fireflyseo.com/wikipedia-link-condoms</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimisation (Optimization)</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wicked Keemo</title>
		<link>http://www.fireflyseo.com/wikipedia-link-condoms#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Wicked Keemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 19:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fireflyseo.com/blog/wikipedia-link-condoms/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Yeah I've noticed that too. I don't think it's just wikipedia though. 
Some SEOs think that Google don't follow the "no follow" links (yahoo and msn still do). But I think that if your "no follow" link is clicked enough times (enough being up for debate) Google WILL follow the link. At the very least they'll add the site to their index.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I&#8217;ve noticed that too. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s just wikipedia though.<br />
Some SEOs think that Google don&#8217;t follow the &#8220;no follow&#8221; links (yahoo and msn still do). But I think that if your &#8220;no follow&#8221; link is clicked enough times (enough being up for debate) Google WILL follow the link. At the very least they&#8217;ll add the site to their index.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
